he Ethics of Withholding / Withdrawing utrition in the Newborn

نویسنده

  • Steven R. Leuthner
چکیده

he provision of nutrition and hydration to newborn infants is considered fundamental care. For remature and critically ill newborns, similar considerations generally hold true. Nutrition may be rovided for these infants using assisted measures such as parenteral nutrition or tube feedings. owever, for some newborn infants the provision of medically assisted nutrition may be a more omplicated issue. In particular, the goals of nutrition need to be clearly elaborated for newborns ith lethal conditions or for whom appropriately administered intensive care is unsuccessful in ustaining life. These infants may benefit from palliative measures of care and a limitation or ithdrawal of burdensome or nonbeneficial interventions. This article explores issues pertinent to eciding and communicating the appropriate withdrawal of medically assisted nutrition and impleenting palliative comfort measures. 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent? A reply to Sulmasy and Sugarman.

This paper argues that Sulmasy and Sugarman have not succeeded in showing a moral difference between withholding and withdrawing treatment. In particular, they have misunderstood historical entitlement theory, which does not automatically prefer a first occupant by just acquisition.

متن کامل

Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent?

Many medical ethicists accept the thesis that there is no moral difference between withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. In this paper, we offer an interesting counterexample which shows that this thesis is not always true. Withholding is distinguished from withdrawing by the simple fact that therapy must have already been initiated in order to speak coherently about withdrawal. ...

متن کامل

Factors related to adult patient decision making about withholding or withdrawing nutrition and/or hydration.

End-of-life decisions that focus on withholding or withdrawing nutrition and/or hydration present difficult choices at particularly vulnerable times for patients and families. Clinical ethics studies published in the last twenty years provide insight about the decision making process that can be useful to all parties involved. The purpose of the systematic research review is to synthesize empir...

متن کامل

The ethics of withholding/withdrawing nutrition in the newborn.

The provision of nutrition and hydration to newborn infants is considered fundamental care. For premature and critically ill newborns, similar considerations generally hold true. Nutrition may be provided for these infants using assisted measures such as parenteral nutrition or tube feedings. However, for some newborn infants the provision of medically assisted nutrition may be a more complicat...

متن کامل

End-of-life after birth: death and dying in a neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE In canonical modern bioethics, withholding and withdrawing medical interventions for dying patients are considered morally equivalent. However, electing not to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) struck us as easily distinguishable from withdrawing mechanical ventilation. Moreover, withdrawing mechanical ventilation from a moribund infant "feels" different from withdrawing ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003